(1) I actually found the works discussed/shown on the
festival blog more interesting than the previous year’s works on loneliness;
the artists worked in creative ways to express loneliness in manners that I
hadn’t thought of. Two standout pieces that I felt reflected vulnerability
quite effectively were Corporal Outis’ stalking project, and Jeff Huckleberry’s
self-affliction performance.
Corporal Outis managed to perform a piece that was
interesting, thoughtful, engaging, and humorous all at once through stalking
willing participants as an icon of popular culture. I loved his account of the
whole process on his blog, and his reflections of how his own perception of
vulnerability changed throughout the piece. His work shows many different types
and subjects of vulnerability and poses questions about the society in which we
live today. He presents his targets as vulnerable subjects through the
surveillance of their homes and workplaces, reminding us all that we are
vulnerable and not as invisible as we may assume. I felt a bit voyeuristic
while looking through photos of others’ homes and a little uneasy at the fact that I was looking at very personal places, yet this is what the general public
sees day to day in the area. I enjoyed when the project’s intention was turned
on its head and Corporal Outis was finding that uninvolved parties were
successfully stalking him, wanting to get a photo taken with the Storm Trooper
walking around town. This reverse-stalking tactic was brought upon by social
media, and I think is something that resonates with most of us who engage in
social media and publish content on the internet, which we don’t usually
realize can be used in such a way. Overall, this performance was a great
experiment toying with layers of emotional vulnerability.
At the other end of the spectrum, Jeff Huckleberry’s piece
explored physical vulnerability, which, honestly, was not something I had
really considered when we learned about the festival’s theme. This reflection
of vulnerability reminded me of a recent first aid course I took, and how it
made me realise just how fragile and vulnerable the human body is. I found it
very hard to keep reading Jeff’s piece because it felt dangerous and painful to
me, as he pulled apart wood and rolled around in breaking beer bottles.
(2) In my own experience, I don’t believe that vulnerability
is something that I stop to contemplate often. I believe that every artist, by
putting a piece of themselves, their beliefs and philosophies, which are all
reflected in their work, is, puts him or herself in such an inherently
vulnerable position. Every medium has the potential for exposure, even if it is
the most personal subject meant for only the artist’s eyes, and thus has the
potential to cause an uncontrolled reaction from outside individuals, who may
or may not understand the work the way the artist has meant it to be
understood. I think that is an incredibly vulnerable position to be in, and
it’s something that probably comes into consideration when an artist produces
every piece they imagine, yet at the same time it is probably something that
many artists learn to push to the back of their mind and attempt to ignore. At
the end of the day though, vulnerability as an artist is inescapable.
(3) As I said above, Corporal Outis’ work was outstanding in
his communication of the emotions of vulnerability. The execution of his piece
was somewhere in the middle between art, popular culture, and technological. I
think this was the most effective communication of vulnerability, as it was out
in public and ended up being very interactive and engaging, even though I was
only reading an account of the events. Because a record of his performance
remains in the blog he set up, it still carries the character he intended to
portray, as opposed to having a third party recount their experience at the
other performances. The other pieces were predominantly at the site of the
festival, attended by art folk within a short period of time, and some
portrayed their ideas in a quite indirect manner. I think these factors alone
regardless of the actual performance are less effective personally, as I didn’t
get the chance to witness them in person. I can imagine many of the
performances would evoke instantaneous feelings as a witness, but they don’t
seem to fully translate well into a written format and I found it hard to uncover
what ideas about vulnerability they were trying to communicate.